Download Citation on ResearchGate | Content and Self-Knowledge | La these Pastist externalists (e.g., Boghossian ; Burge ) maintain that the past. Volume 17, Issue 1, Spring Philosophy of Mind. Paul A. Boghossian. Pages DOI: /philtopics Content and Self-Knowledge. Content and Self-Knowledge. Paul A. Boghossian University of Michigan. INTRODUCTION I. This paper argues that, given a certain apparently inevitable thesis.
|Published (Last):||12 November 2012|
|PDF File Size:||13.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This attitude is encouraged by research from empirical psychology, which suggests that self-knowledge is largely an illusion.
Paul Boghossian, Content and self-knowledge – PhilPapers
In more detail, if Oscar is agnostic about chemistry and knows that apriori about himself, he can use the reflections above to know apriori that his water thoughts metaphysically require the existence of water or a community. The claim is that EXT and SK jointly entail an obvious falsehood, namely, that Oscar can know from the armchair contingent facts about the external world McKinsey ; ; ;BrownBoghossian ; However, if a person regards this metaphysical claim as warranted along with 2 —then she cannot rationally put 3 in doubt.
But for replies, see Korman and Parent a,ch. Even if Oscar knows his water thoughts at t 1yet these morph into twin water thoughts at t cintenthe no longer knows at t 2 about any water thoughts.
But the argument does not transmit warrant to its conclusion; it cannot bogossian any warrant on 3 that was not already there. The debate on externalism and self-knowledge should continue to see new developments.
But again, if content determines reference, the difference in reference demonstrates a difference in intension or content, in spite of identical internal states. Sarah Sawyer – – Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 4 4: The Psychology of Folk Psychology.
Content and Self-Knowledge in Philosophy of Mind
Environmental Implications are Empirical 2. If content determines reference, then a difference in reference between Oscar and Twin Oscar shows a difference in content. Nevertheless, some philosophers reject these considerations for a variety of reasons ZemachMellorSearlech.
This article has no associated abstract. Brueckner – – Mind 99 It is a case where the truth of his judgment is certain, even if its content is in question. Yet she can add that Oscar loses some memory content regardless, thanks to the slow switch. So it seems incorrect to say that 2 is something known. Related Entries introspection mental content: Keith Hossack – – Oxford University Press.
Goldberg a is germane too.
Rather, memory content is conditioned by the environment in which recall occurs Ludlow a; ; ; Gibbons ; Tye ; Bernecker Mirror Sites View this site from another server: There, even a relevant alternatives epistemology requires Oscar to rule out the Twin Earth interpretation.
Some externalists have even offered independent arguments to that effect Putnam Find it on Scholar. If a subject S is warranted in believing p and is warranted in believing that p entails q and S further recognizes that q follows deductively from these beliefs —then S acquires, potentially for the first time, a warrant in believing q.
In section 4, we will end with some lesser-known issues for externalist self-knowledge. Foundations and ApplicationsM. So the apriority of 1 is not guaranteed here, and the reductio seems in doubt. One accuses the advocate of conflating different types of warrant RaffmanSainsbury Still, the main goal was to block the inference from A to Band self-verifying judgments seem to do that.
Paul A. Boghossian, Content and Self-Knowledge in Philosophy of Mind – PhilPapers
Accordingly, Burge rejects premise c of the memory argument: Keith Butler – – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 4: For the thought experiments alone do not assume boghosslan water is necessary for water thoughts Brueckner Ingar Brinck – – Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 5: The last response to the reductio is to deny that the argument is a reductio at all.
Toward making this clearer, suppose that Oscar is informed of the switches at some later time t 3. How We Know Our Minds: