Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology [ Jacques Monod, Austryn Wainhouse] on *FREE* shipping on. Jacques Monod () was a French biologistwidely regarded as the ” father of molecular biology”who was awarded a Nobel Prize in Physiology or. Jacques Monod ( – ) was a French biologist who was awarded a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in for his discoveries in.
|Published (Last):||21 May 2015|
|PDF File Size:||12.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
At the core of the book is a resolution of the contradiction between the seemingly goal-oriented nature of evolution and definitely goal-oriented nature of organisms and the essential randomness and chance underlying evolution’s mechanics.
Study of the control of expression of genes in the lac operon provided the first example necssity a transcriptional regulation system.
Here Monod highlights the apparent epistemological contradiction between the teleonomy of living organisms and the principle of objectivity. The first is feedback inhibition.
View all 34 comments. The author next turns his attention to the central nervous system. One that clearly reflects his background as a scientist but at the same time shows his philosophical literacy and acumen.
One is teleonomy which Monod defines as the characteristic of being “endowed with a purpose or project” Monod, 9. Not so with Monod, he does not argue for the possibility of pure objectivity, rather, he postulates it. He looks at the philosophical basis of Marxism, which, he persuasively argues, is really just another example of what he refers to as “animism”: Monod mentions oligomeric globular proteins again and how they appear in aggregates containing geometrically equivalent protomer subunits associated into a non-covalent steric complex.
Nothing we’ve learned since Monod published this book does anything but bolster his position. We are the initiators of action in the environment that the environment in turn acts upon and both result in our transformation as a species and as individuals.
Chance and Necessity (Jacques Monod) – book review
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. The third chapter is named ” Maxwell’s Demons “.
Today he knows they are his and his alone, but now he is master of them they seem to be dissolving in the uncaring emptiness of the universe”. Animist philosophy Leibniz, Hegel, Teilhard de Chardin, Marx sees a progressive unfolding of purpose in evolution, leading to its highest expression in man.
This innateness, he argues, stands in direct contrast to all empiricist philosophy. Monod starts the preface of the book by saying that biology is both marginal and central. He also, while discussing major gaffes made by assuming the universe is goal-driven, amusingly dismantles dialectical materialism.
Jacques Monod’s Chance and Necessity is one of my favourite works on the philosophy of biology. Mass Market Paperbackpages. Immediately after this, however, in the final sentences of the book, the more fundamental conclusion of Chance and Necessity is reiterated.
Monod goes on to elaborate this correspondance, and shows how the processes by which living creatures reproduce are fundamentally similar, at a molecular level, to those that make a crystal grow. To them, a being made sense and was understandable only through the purpose animating the being and so, if mysterious objects, such as rocks, rivers, rain, and stars, exist it must also be for a purpose essentially there are no inanimate objects to them. This page was last edited on 13 Novemberat Vitalism Bergson has life infused with a mysterious impulse that is void of any predetermined purpose.
A totally blind process can by definition lead to anything; it can even lead to vision itself” Monod He then talks about the evolution of our ancestors including the development of upright posture which allowed them to become hunters. The author spends the rest of the chapter discussing linguistic and physical human evolutionary development. He spends a good deal of time explaining the fascinating details of how enzymes, the complex proteins involved in the process of DNA replication, are both created by the DNA and also used by it to perform this task.
While some might choose to build a world-view on this, you don’t have to subscribe to any of it; by Monod’s own cognisance, you can make your own “free choice”. In doing this he engages with philosophical doctrines he thinks are misguided and proposes a doctrine of his own.
Jul 26, Mariana rated it liked it. Clear argument for an objective materialist worldview. It is an idea that owes its force to its logical coherence alone. The author then writes that a primary structure exists in a single or a small number of related states, as is the case with allosteric proteins precisely defined conformational native state under normal physiological conditions.
But it is not an incoherent dream.
The author then says that due to the accelerating pace of cultural evolution, it no longer affects the jacqes and that selection does not favor the genetic survival of the fittest through a more numerous progeny. Rather, it places the thesis part of xhance dialectic squarely within the organism.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Monod, appalled at Lysenko’s mendacious pseudo-scientific nonsense, tore it to pieces. Necesskty should read necessiyt. Dismissing as “animist” not only Plato, Hegel, Bergson and Teilhard de Chardin but Spencer and Marx as well, he calls for a new ethic that will recognize the distinction between objective knowledge and the realm of values–an ethic of knowledge that can, perhaps, save us from our deepening spiritual malaise, from the new age of darkness he sees coming.
He also laments the split in the modern psyche between our reliance on objective knowledge for practical progress and on the older animist systems of values for our moral beliefs. Monod starts off chapter I entitled “Of Strange Objects” with a consideration of the difference between natural and artificial objects and states that “the basic premise of the scientific method Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding or removing nad. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. The author points to what he sees as the acceptance of objective science in practice but not in spirit.
June Learn how and when to remove this template message. The ethic of knowledge – to subjectively take an objective stance in the search for knowledge as the foundation of your ethical system.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.