Historico debate;La existencia de Dios Russell VS Copleston:ESPAÑOL en 2D. Sobre la santificacion de la memoria. Find this Pin and more on La Fe. Materia y racionalidad: sobre la existencia de la Idea de Pérez Bertrand Russell y F. C. Copleston: “Debate sobre la existencia de Dios”. Existencia e identidad: especificación frente a descripción de un dominio.A. Arrieta Bertrand Russell y F. C. Copleston: “Debate sobre la existencia de Dios “.

Author: Mira Mulrajas
Country: Saint Lucia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 8 November 2005
Pages: 152
PDF File Size: 7.25 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.69 Mb
ISBN: 590-3-59504-896-4
Downloads: 14416
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Malar

I am simply trying to point out that anybody who says that a particular system of modern logic is the sole criterion of meaning is saying something that is over-dogmatic; he is dogmatically insisting that a part of philosophy is the whole of philosophy.

But when is an explanation adequate? It is not direct feeling about the act by which Debatw should judge, but rather a feeling as to the effects. This entry has no external links.

Francis of Assisi, when you get an experience that results in an overflow of dynamic and creative love, the best explanation of that it seems to me is the actual existence of an objective cause of the experience.

Agustin Arrieta Urtizberea – – Teorema: A man may look for gold without assuming that there is gold everywhere; if he finds gold, well and good, if he doesn’t he’s had bad luck. Science Logic and Mathematics. Well, that is an excellent justification, I agree. Existsncia I should say the same thing in another context in reference to a “Necessary Drbate. Wonfilio Trejo – – Critica 5 When Sartre, for example, says the rudsell is gratuitous, I think that he has not sufficiently considered what is implied by “gratuitous.

Debate Sobre La Existencia De Dios by Bertrand Russell (2 star ratings)

As regards the metaphysical argument, we are apparently in agreement that what we call the world consists simply of contingent beings. I can see they are different.


rios At one period in the development of the human race, almost everybody thought cannibalism was a duty. Well, that’s always assuming that not only every particular thing ezistencia the world, but the world as a whole must have a cause.

It seems to me entirely It is only true a posteriori through our experience of the world that we come to a knowledge of the existence of that Being. Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

The fact that I wouldn’t do it doesn’t really bear on this question we’re discussing. Then you have to say one or other of two things. I maintain the meaninglessness of certain particular terms — not on any general ground, but simply because I’ve not been able to see an interpretation of those particular terms. It may be, but it does show that physicists’ minds can conceive it.

Because, therefore, it will follow that sohre cannot be an analytic proposition ever to say that this or that exists. And then one argues, the essence and existence must be identical. Then you have to take account of the effects of actions. I see no reason to suppose that one could condition all men as one can “condition” an animal, and I don’t suppose you’d really want to do so even if one could.

And the mystic, if his vision is veridical, may be said to know that there are devils. Well, you say, I believe, that it is bad grammar, copleton rather bad syntax to say for example “T. It’s my opinion that the perception of values and the consciousness of moral law and obligation are best explained through the hypothesis of a transcendent ground of value and of an existencai of the moral law.

I really don’t see how it can be conveyed to anybody in other terms than itself. To Adolf Hitler cebate suppose it appeared as something good and desirable, I suppose you’d have to admit that for Hitler it was good and for you it is evil. Would you agree with me that the problem of God is a problem of great importance? It seems to me to be external customs and taboos and things of that sort which can most easily be explained simply through environment and education, but all that seems to me to belong to what I call the matter of the law, the content.


Why deabte rather than nothing, that is the question? I don’t think you’d say that, would you?

The feeling is a little too simplified. And since in coplestno case you won’t get more than probability that’s good enough. History of Western Philosophy.

Lorenzo Vicente Burgoa – – Ciencia Tomista I remember Julian Huxley in some lecture saying that religious experience, or mystical experience, is as much a real experience as falling in love or appreciating poetry and art. He’s finding out quite a lot of things — the scientist is finding out quite a lot of things that are happening in the world, which are, at first, beginnings of causal chains — first causes which haven’t in themselves got causes. Well, this being is either itself the reason for its own existence, or it is not.

Well, I should have to answer at considerable length to answer that.

Reflexiones sobre la existencia de Dios

For you it has no meaning. Take, say, such a word as “the” or “than. However, I must say I see little resemblance between the real influence of those books on me and the mystic experience proper, so far, that is, as an outsider can obtain an idea of that experience.

On the actual point discussed, whether there is or is not a Necessary Being, I find myself, I think in agreement with the great majority of classical philosophers.

Author: admin