Historico debate;La existencia de Dios Russell VS Copleston:ESPAÑOL en 2D. Sobre la santificacion de la memoria. Find this Pin and more on La Fe. Materia y racionalidad: sobre la existencia de la Idea de Pérez Bertrand Russell y F. C. Copleston: “Debate sobre la existencia de Dios”. Existencia e identidad: especificación frente a descripción de un dominio.A. Arrieta Bertrand Russell y F. C. Copleston: “Debate sobre la existencia de Dios “.

Author: Dijin Samule
Country: Ukraine
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 23 May 2012
Pages: 303
PDF File Size: 4.34 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.54 Mb
ISBN: 946-8-53034-127-9
Downloads: 97940
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faular

Well, I should have to answer at considerable length to answer that. When the logic that he uses was new — namely, in the time rissell Aristotle, there had to be a great deal of fuss made about it; Aristotle made a lot of fuss about that logic.

Again, even if all modern logicians held that metaphysical terms are meaningless, it would not follow that they sobrre right. And the effect of that experience is, I should say, borne out, or I mean the validity of th experience is borne out in the records of the life of Plotinus. That’s what we can do with ourselves and nothing more.

This entry has no external links. Take the case of a non-Christian, Plotinus. I can see they are different. Would you agree — provisionally at least — to accept this statement as the meaning of the term “God”?

Wonfilio Trejo, Russell: descripcion y existencia – PhilPapers

The actual basic experience at any rate is most easily explained on the hypotheses that there is actually some objective cause of that experience. But that’s my point. This article has no associated abstract.


It’s quite all right if you mean by explaining it, simply finding a cause for it. It would be quite right to say that it appealed to his emotions, but you can say various things about that among others, that if that sort of thing makes that sort of appeal to Hitler’s emotions, then Hitler makes quite a different appeal to my emotions.

I do mean by “author of the moral law” an arbitrary author of the moral law. In any case, I don’t say that ezistencia universe is something different from the objects which compose it I indicated that in my brief summary of the proof.

And that reason must be an existent being. An adequate explanation must ultimately be a total explanation, to which nothing further can be added. As regards the metaphysical argument, we are apparently in agreement that what we call the world consists simply of contingent beings.

At one period in the development of the human race, almost everybody thought cannibalism was a duty. I think that the recognition of this ideal moral order is part of the recognition of contingency. Well, it seems to me that the scientist does make some such assumption.

Something does exist; therefore, there must be something which accounts for this fact, a being which is outside the series of contingent beings. But when you get what one might call the pure type, rissell St.


Debate Sobre La Existencia De Dios

I maintain the meaninglessness of certain particular terms — not on any general ground, but simply because I’ve not been able to see an interpretation of those particular terms. Copleston Jesuit Catholic priest versus Bertrand Russell agnostic philosopher, picture right Listen to the original Fr. The moral exitsencia, for example, is always changing.

Well, I wonder now whether that isn’t simply a temporary inference.

Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God

Sign in Create an account. The dogmatic position behind it seems to be this: I wouldn’t imitate the conduct of a mad dog.

What I’m doing is to look for the reason, in this case the cause of the objects — the real or imagined totality of which constitute what we call the universe. Practically speaking — yes.

There are plenty of terrestrial law-givers to account debzte it, and that would explain why people’s consciences are so amazingly different in different times and places. Japanese novelists never consider that they have achieved a success unless large numbers of real people commit suicide for love of the imaginary heroine. Well, I think he does assume or is bound to assume it tacitly in practice.

Author: admin