The laterolog was put into service in , predating the induction log by 6 or 7 years, Logarithmic scales appeared for the dual laterolog and later tools to. Dual laterolog resistivity measurements; Laterolog anomalies; Azimuthal dual laterologs. 2 Array electrode tools; 3 Shallow focused. Description. The QLDLL3 Dual Laterolog tool provides a time multiples dual spacing focused resistivity measurement with two different.

Author: Dukazahn Zulkirr
Country: Costa Rica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 16 December 2014
Pages: 460
PDF File Size: 9.44 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.60 Mb
ISBN: 492-1-71060-724-9
Downloads: 14881
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mikazilkree

Because it has no bridle, it does not suffer from Groningen effect. To estimate R t under a variety of different logging conditions and in different formations, a simple three-parameter, step-profile invasion model is often used. Measurements with the following features should be chosen: Resistivity logging is the recording,in uncased or recently cased sections of a borehole, of the resistivities or their reciprocals, the conductivities of the subsurface formations, generally along with the spontaneous potentials Latrrolog generated in the borehole.

This model consists of a flushed zone of resistivity R xo and a sharp boundary at diameter d ilterolog the uninvaded zone of resistivity R t. The current switch is changed to position 2. A cylindrical focusing technique CFT is used to measure and compensate for this distortion by restoring the cylindrical geometry of the equipotential surfaces in front of the measurement electrodes.

Conversely, a laterolog tool is preferred when R xo is less than R t. Like the ARI tool, the azimuthal array of the HALS makes deep and shallow resistivity measurements around the borehole with a 1- or 2-ft [0. Although most of the current returns through the casing, some small fraction of it will leak off from the outside of the casing and will return through the earth. These include the ring electrode measurement, with a depth of investigation of approximately 9 in.

Therefore, when R xo is greater than R tan induction tool is preferred for R t determination because laterolog tools will be affected mostly by R xo. When the GVR tool is positioned directly above the bit, the resistivity measurement has a resolution of approximately 2 ft [61 cm], which is usually adequate for “geostopping”—stopping drilling precisely at casing or coring depths.

Commercial tools were introduced in by Schlumberger [14] and Baker Atlas. The high-resolution LLhr laterollog reads almost as deeply into the formation as a deep laterolog LLd curve, particularly when R yo is less than R t.


Because the borehole is generally more conductive than the formation, the current tends to stay in the mud, and the latrolog responds primarily to the volume of mud in front of each azimuthal electrode. These recordings are used for correlation of the strata and detection and quantitative evaluation of possibly productive horizons.

The voltage difference is now measuring the resistance of the casing, R 1. He has extensively travelled throughout the world and is now based in South Australia. The laterolog is generally recommended for holes drilled with very conductive drilling muds i.

Thousands of them were run each year all over the world. This article discusses the types of resistivity logging devices that rely on electrodes. The apparent resistivities RLA1 through RLA5 are all sensitive to the formation, becoming progressively deeper in investigation. Both logs share the same electrodes and have the same current-beam thickness, but different focusing currents give ,aterolog different depths of investigation.

Electrode resistivity devices –

The distance AO is the spacing of the lateral device. See the section on invasion interpretation for more details on the determination of R tR xoand d i. The HRLA tool uses segmented bucking electrodes and multifrequency operation ranging from 75 to Hz to acquire six simultaneous measurements.

Laterolog tools are resistivity devices, which are most accurate in medium- to high-resistivity formations. Laterolog and SFL log readings are influenced by the borehole mud, adjacent shoulder beds, and the invaded zone as well as the uninvaded formation.

The current is injected into the casing and returns to an electrode in the earth some distance from the casing. Despite the apparent paradox of measuring formation resistivity through the highly-conductive steel casing, dkal are now available that can measure the formation resistivity to considerable accuracy. Resistivity logging involves the measurement of electrical properties of the rock. The Schlumberger high-resolution laterolog array HRLA tool consists of five laterolog arrays with different depths of investigation.

During the first quarter century of well logging, the only electrical surveys ES available were the resistivity logs made with so-called lateral and normal devices plus the spontaneous potential SP. Deep measurements associated with the longest sensor spacings are used in evaluating the uncontaminated formation resistivity structure.

For normal devices Fig. The dual focussed laterolog udal an electrical probe with a short and long electrode laterolo different rock volumes away from the borehole. The hardware injects the currents in a way that is as close to focused as possible.


Dual Laterolog Tool (EDLT) | LandSea – Open Hole and Cased Hole Logging Systems

A calibration box with a range of resistors capable of setting values from 1 through a ohm-metres is used for calibration and verification. The first resistivity devices were the normals and laterals. The Schlumberger DLL has a modified-geometry measurement that can also be recorded. ,aterolog LLs measurement therefore has a shallower depth of investigation and responds more strongly to the region around the borehole that is usually affected by invasion.

It uses small electrodes that can be combined with the dual-induction tool to provide shallow-investigation data for invasion evaluation.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Most of laterklog current returns to the A2 electrode near the azimuthal array. The Schlumberger Geovision Resistivity GVR tool [16] is an electrode resistivity tool that measures five resistivity values—bit, ring, and three button resistivities—as well as gamma-ray and shock measurements.

The data are usually stored downhole for later retrieval, although a compressed image and selected button data may be transmitted to the surface in real time together with the ring and bit resistivities and gamma-ray measurements. The resulting operation of the azimuthal array has no effect on the LLd and LLs measurements.

Dual Laterolog Service

Nevertheless, the conventional ES logs consisting of SP; in. Interpretation of laterals and normals is very complicated because the response is a complicated function of the formation being measured. The measure current I 0 is emitted from the central A0 electrode, returning to an “infinitely distant” electrode, usually at the surface.

The shoulder-bed and invasion responses of laterolog tools are combined in the tool response in ways that are difficult to separate. A two-parameter inversion model can also be used in real time to solve for R t and d iwith R xo provided by the microcylindrically focused log MCFL measurements of the Platform Express tool.

The SFL electrode array consists of current-emitting, current-return, and measure electrodes.

Author: admin