Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.

Author: Doutaur Daigul
Country: Romania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 9 August 2017
Pages: 303
PDF File Size: 1.33 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.17 Mb
ISBN: 641-8-21127-251-4
Downloads: 31747
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dizragore

Government of the Philippines. This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method.

This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat Metadata Show full item record. Some features of this site may not work without it. In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting. Text Halaman Judul 0HK Retrieved 13 September JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Collections Skripsi Sarjana [86].

But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.

Archived from the original on 9 April ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State.

But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one.

Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute

Retrieved 7 February Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah. Thesis Sipsdan Uncontrolled Keywords: Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia. Abstract Indonesia’s diplomatic relations with friendly countries especially with Malaysia was formally established since 31 August when Malaysia declared its independence.


The dispute arises from the application of different principles to the determination of the boundaries of the ksaus shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region kaasus overlap which can cause disputes. International Court of Justice cases Territorial disputes of Indonesia Territorial disputes of Malaysia Islands of Sabah in case law in Indonesia in Malaysia Indonesia—Malaysia border Indonesia—Malaysia relations in international relations.

Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute – Wikipedia

Sources of data used in this study are secondary data, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and others related to this research. But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes. Retrieved from ” https: This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and Ligitan islands.

Divided among multiple claimants. The Philippines had applied during the proceedings to intervene over the case on the basis of their claim to northern Borneo. Archived from the original on 5 March Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius.

Text Bab I 1HK EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February International Court of Justice.

The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia. The approach method use for this research is Juridical Normative. Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah. More information and software credits.


Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan. The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Sipada ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia.

In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data. What it is and how it Works. Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia kass and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island.

Kasus Indonesia vs Malaysia by claudia hartono on Prezi

Views Read Edit View history. This daj tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Ligitan island. The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt xipadan intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case.

Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate. The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent.

The consideration of the judges of the International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based on several factors: This research is kind of research literature study.

Sovereignty over Ligitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v.

Author: admin