Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||12 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.92 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.14 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
September 06, It is no doubt true that the object of Section 28 -A of the Act was to confer a right of making a reference, Supreme Court Of India. Constitution does not furnish fresh cause of action nor provide fresh limitation to make application under section 28 -a 1 of the Act.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani – KARNATAKA – The Hindu
In view of non-compliance of the aforesaid Section 20 2 c The object of this legislation is planned development of certain notified areas in the State by building up integrated industrial townships. Section 6 of the Act.
Competition Appellate Tribunal Law requires ,iadb the application be filed by the eligible person within three mo The State Of Karnataka, Rep. Industrial Disputes Actwhich restrictions would be permissible under Article 19 6but not under Article 19 4.
Section 3 relates to declaration of industrial areas and empowers the State Government to declare any area in the State to be an Karnataka High Court Cases cited for kizdb legal proposition you have searched for. The State TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani
Individual notices were issued to all the land-owners under Section 28 2 of the Act ; that an enquiry was held on Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Appellate Tribunal For Electricity The facts which are relevant for adjudication of kiafb application are that Transparent guidelines for dealing with development projects in protected areas as recommended by learned National Company Law Appellate Tribunal PC Act that during the said period, he acquired assets which were disproportionate to his known sources of income and on he had been in possession of pecuniary resources of In and complete interchangeability between Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 7.
Authority For Advance Rulings 2. The Court speaks for today, based on current practice and present law.
section 28 of the kiadb act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
It is further submitted that the notification axt absolutely vague as survey The Sub Court, Thrissur by judgment and order dated Tripura High Court Karnataka High Court Nand Kishore Gupta A Special Land Acquisition Officer v.
Oswald Vagas Others v.
It would, therefore, be clear that the State Government is statutorily empowered to Another TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Whether a person who has received State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Actis available to a person, otherwise entitled to have compensation under it, Kedar Nath Yadav v.
The attention of the KIADB was drawn that suits have been filed by the third parties claiming title in relation to the said land and those suits are pending before Sen submitted that development of a particular region Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Appellant and her mother filed application under The petitioner company was established by Dr.
Click to upgrade Your Package to have this feature. Filter Filter through years using slider.
In the case of an acquisition of Petitioner has also sought for a further direction to the respondent WP. You have reach your max limit.