Kupiec, P.H. () Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3, This paper presents a comparative evaluation of the predictive performance of conventional univariate VaR models including unconditional normal distribution. Request PDF on ResearchGate | Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Management Models | Risk Paul Kupiec at American Enterprise Institute.

Author: Kitaxe Zumi
Country: Anguilla
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 15 January 2010
Pages: 33
PDF File Size: 14.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.6 Mb
ISBN: 987-7-94639-840-8
Downloads: 77943
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Salkree

Setup a permanent sync to delicious. The corresponding VaR limits are also given as a proportion or percentage. A variation on the binomial test proposed kupkec the Basel Committee is the traffic light test or three zones test. The three zones are defined as follows:. The probability is computed using a binomial distribution.

Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models

Profits and losses are expressed in monetary units and represent value changes in a portfolio. You can use this daily data to assess the performance of VaR models, which is the goal of VaR backtesting. For a given test confidence level, a straightforward accept-or-reject result in this case is to fail the VaR model whenever x is outside the test confidence interval for the expected number of exceptions.

CiteULike organises scholarly or academic papers or literature and provides bibliographic which means it makes bibliographies for universities and higher education establishments. You can help correct errors and omissions.

This statistic is asymptotically distributed as a chi-square variable with x degrees of freedom, where x is the number of failures. By clicking “OK” you acknowledge that you have the right to distribute this file. Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance.


CiteULike uses cookies, some of which may already have been set. All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. General contact details of provider: Translated by Mouseover text to see original.

You can help adding them by using this form. Overview of VaR Backtesting Market risk is the risk of losses verifyung positions arising from movements in acchracy prices. Click here to see To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

Using exact probabilities from the binomial distribution or a normal approximation, the bin function uses a normal approximation. Click the button below to return to the English version of the page. The toolbox supports these VaR backtests: The TUFF test is also based on a likelihood ratio, but the underlying distribution is a geometric distribution. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. By computing the probability of observing x exceptions, you can compute the probability of wrongly rejecting a good model when x exceptions occur.

Register and you can start organising your references online. Search all the public and authenticated articles in CiteULike.

Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models – EconBiz

In practice, many techniquess metrics and statistical tests are used to identify VaR models that are performing poorly or performing better. For more information, see References for Christoffersen, ccand cci. The POF test statistic is.

CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Returns represent the change in portfolio value as a proportion or percentage of its kupie on the previous day. In addition, it uses a likelihood ratio to test whether the probability of exceptions is synchronized with the probability p implied by the VaR confidence level.


We will interpret your continued use of this site as your acceptance of our use of cookies. Check below whether another version of this item is available online. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Te POF test works with the binomial distribution approach. Kupiec introduced a variation on the binomial test called the proportion of failures POF technique.

We have no references for this item. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: VaR is an estimate of how much value a portfolio can lose in a given time period with a given confidence level. Home Citegeist Everyone’s Library. If oupiec know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item.

Select a Web Site

For more information, see References for Haas, tbfand tbfi. Select a Web Site Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Read about how we use cookies. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates.

The most straightforward test is to compare the observed number of exceptions, xto the tecniques number of exceptions. There are no reviews of this article. As a best practice, use more than veritying criterion to backtest the performance of VaR models, because all tests have strengths and weaknesses.

Author: admin